Yesterday, I witnessed a sad and somewhat pathetic spectacle… a sight that reminded me of a documentary concerning Hizballah, in which a cleric who accompanied Nasrallah to Qom said something akin to the following: “Nasrallah stood out from the very beginning – he was brilliant. However, his brilliance revolved exclusively around the matter of Israel. In all other matters, even those concerning religion and theology, he was relatively mediocre.”
Yesterday, I watched a man that I once had a modicum of respect for, make a fool of himself. On that screen, he might as well have been naked - because all who wanted to could see through the garbs of confidence and impregnability covering his body.
For all his arrogant slogans about eliminating corrupt government; for all his mocking of political rivals; for all the talk from his supporters about ‘clean hands;’ for all of that nonesense, Nasrallah, yesterday revealed to his audience that he, the leader of the holy muqawama, is as full of hot air as the rest of his counterparts in Lebanon's political elite are – yet more dangerous because of his agenda.
Yesterday, Nasrallah articulated to the Lebanese people what he wanted. He asked all Lebanese, “across sectarian lines,” for support. Why? Because, 1) He wants war against Israel 2) And he wants a “fair, representative and clean national-unity government” with at least a third of the ministers to wage his war against Israel. Period. Everything else he said (and I mean everything), somehow found their way back to those two points.
And for all this religious cleric's talk about the nonsectarian nature of his movement, his biggest crowd pleasers (and he knew they would be, as he recorded his speech) were phrases like “you are a people that rises above pain,” and “you are a people that will not be intimidated,” and “you are a people who survived the heaviest onslaught of bombardment in recent memory.” Politically, he added, “we” seek “fair representation,” and “we” deserve a “national unity government,” etc, etc….
A reasonable question to ask at this juncture is: under what premise does Nasrallah base his argument that this government cannot be characterized as “fair?” Is his premise constitutional? Is it legal? Is it religious? Or is it based on foreign policy decisions? I want to know… What is his premise?
For as far as I can tell, Parliament’s make-up – and I’m talking about a parliament that Hizballah is very much a part of – dictates that this government (even as it exists today) is constitutionally “fair” and representative.
Yet, all this talk is merely marginal. What really surprised me yesterday, was what seemed to be Nasrallah’s rhetorical, but more importantly, mental limitations. The man appeared almost unable to formulate any arguments outside of the paradigm of war with Israel. Even when he sought to escape from it, he quickly ran back into his comfort zone, and spouted out the same pedestrian language with the expected accompanying haughty, arrogant tone. In short, his performance yesterday portrayed a man who cannot but infuse the struggle against Israel into every subject delved into, be it regarding issues of representation, or such mundane matters as social welfare, health-care and even street-cleaning.
In light of this realization, I asked myself: is this one-dimensional human being actually selling himself as a leader? This man who, like Ahab, captain of the Pequod, seems utterly overwhelmed by his irrational and uncontrollable drive to find and kill the ever-elusive Moby Dick – whatever the cost to himself and his companions. A man who, outside of his single obsession, appears as one who stumbles over and over again as he struggles to walk inside of a pitch-dark room!
Today, finally, one certainty has emerged: I can and will, with a clear conscience, rebuke all of Nasrallah’s supporters – especially those who argue that he has earned their support because of their unfounded assumption that he is somehow a more capable leader/governor/politician than his counterparts.
On that note, allow me to present at least some good news: Nasrallah may be aware of his limitations, and seeks merely to help bring about an environment in which he may do what he loves most. Simply put, the man seeks calm waters that would permit him to return to and focus on his hunt! It is for this particular reason that I will also, and again with clear conscience, rebuke those who argue that they support Nasrallah because they believe he has “clean hands.”
For if those among the political elite who are said to have “dirty hands” were to allow Nasrallah to feel comfortable enough to return to his obsession, the Seyyid would give them free reign to pillage and plunder as much as they saw fit. He did it before, and he'll do it again.
No, Lebanon… Nasrallah is not the answer. No, Hizballah... Nasrallah is not even your answer either. The Southern front is no more. The only way you can open it back up is by destroying the country. Therefore, for your sake, and the sake of the country, I implore that you seek new leadership.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
It's difficult at times to understand how odvious bad desions can be taken by supposed educated leaders of state & people.
Fantastic post, Raja! Fantastic! Excellent! Bravo!
Great post raja, I think you put into words what many of us were thinking.
... Unfortunately (not to me), I am no big fan of religious zealoutry in any of its forms, and I don't think that the ends justify the means or that you can ever justify any means to achieve certain ends... To cut the rambling short, the above 3 sentences sum up my disapproval of Hizballa, the means that they use to achieve their goals, and more importantly their goals.
Now here is the question, lets say for argument's sake (and it ain't gonna happen in a monolothic organization like HA) that they do replace nasralla as chair. And lets assume we get in his place a multi-dimensional leader. One who does have a plan for the economy and for the society as well as for foreign affairs and defence. Would we better off unleashing the ideological and theocratic beast that lies beneath the not-too-deep surface of HA.
In my opinion there is no way of dealing "correctly" with HA, simply because they cannot compromise and they cannot be uprooted. They are structured and they function in such a way that they simply can't concede. Not any more. With the southern front closed for the moment and the government moving on a path of pro-western policies in anticipation of a tribunal report that will be damning to HA's syrian allies. In the midst of a regional struggle in which Iran is pitted against the west. With the president of Lebanon, their ally, on the way out (in aobut a year), and a parliamentary deadlock on his replacement approaching, the government is simply critical since it will be in charge of the entire executive branch once the president is out. The majority controls parliament too, so I don't think they would be in any rush to end the deadlock... Thus, I don't think HA and its allies have any alternatives short of toppling the government and having over one third in its replacement. Anything short of that spells another defeat that they can stack up with the rest of the defeats they have been piling up, i.e. the Syrian withdrawal and the recent war with the UNIFIL effectively closing the border to HA... Their backs are against the proverbial wall, and as they say "desperate people do desperate things". (credit to fubar on the last sentence).
Raja,
You took the words out of my mouth. That speech was despicable. Hasan Nasrallah, by nature of the ideology he espouses, cannot do otherwise. But I still had some hope... no longer.
Raja, I don't think Nasrallah is as one-dimensional as you make him out to be. Hizballah's protests now have multiple goals, but they build on the momentum of the summer war. The Israel rhetoric serves to bring out the political capital that Hizballah has accumulated by surviving the war. So, it is no surprise that Nasrallah kept bringing it up.
As for your criticism of "clean hands", I completely agree with that. I also feel that whatever respect I had for the man has been squandered when he started sounding and acting like any Lebanese politician.
Question though (and I don't mean this facetiously). There are constant criticims on the blogs I visit of Hizballah and Nasrallah. How come there's little of anyone else? Does it have to do with the confessional make up? Or have I just been popping in at the wrong moments?
suha, maybe part of it is sectarian. but i think the criticism stems more from the man's actions. as for myself, i just see that times are changing, but this one party refuses change. I see a Lebanon that wants to close out one chapter of its history and move on to the next, but one man, one party, struggling to prevent the pages from turning. That determination, to me, is Hizballah's greatest sin.
r,
you raise valid concerns. Whether Hizballah can truly morph into a peaceful party is still an open question. However, the party does have different components to it - more benevolent components - that could rise up to the surface. or at least that is my hope.
Raja,
I could happily join the applause for your post, if I was not concerned because of the doubt I have that similar discussions and opinions as in your post are taking place now all over Lebanon.
True, it is quite clear for you the single dimension, unfit for national leadership and non-reliable character of Nasralla.
But.. sadly.. those features are easily non-evident in the eyes of masses.
This is my concern.
What is in your opinion, or in your view the reaction of the masses?
abubalboola
Very thoughtful posts! Nasrallah presents us at best with fraudulent mediocrity hovering around an opportunistic "resistant" stance against Israel that left Lebanon against his will in May 2000, thus officially fulfilling Resolution 425 which he and friends used to claim was the only thing they wanted. On the subject of distributing certificates of patriotism and finger-pointing traitors, tell me how you'd qualify the following: I know a guy, Samer T., who told me after the July war that he'd evacuated his parents to Syria on July 10 on information that all hell was about to break loose. Now this guy is extremely polished, brilliant even, well introduced in all the region's major corporations and to some political parties, and also a devout Moslem. He refused to tell me how he knew. But there is only one possibility: It is that someone from Hizbullah told him. Perhaps someone dissenting with the leadership because it didn't believe in consequences of their planned action as catastrophic as the Shalit war in Gaza, perhaps someone close to the leadership who knew, with the leadership, that disaster would be forthcoming. In the first case, Nasrallah comes out as a Stalinian character deciding to wage war against all the hard evidence that it would be disaster (much like Stalin refusing to believe his intelligence before Germany's imminent attack in June 1941) and therefore pretty much irresponsible; in the second case, the one I tend to favor, he knew the consequences and he did it anyway only for internal political reasons. In this case, he comes out not only as his usual reckless hostage-taking cynical self but also as an unqualified traitor. Frankly, Siniora's stock shot up in my books when Nasrallah insinuated that he'd given orders to the army to intercept weapons shipments to Hizbullah. That was plain and simple the right thing to do: Nasrallah's "resistance" is Lebanon's only to the extent that it is shoven down our throats (witness the unfortunate initial statement of the Council of Ministers "Bayan Wizari").
Hassan Nasrallah acquired a new label: The Liar in chief of the bashari/iranni camp in the Lebanon. Many people were impressed by his ways of speech and his magic. They never thought that this man is a seasoned liar. He lied in past and he will lie in the future. You know the nature of this man by observing this 'Gobels" like yellow propaganda machine that has lead to the creation of an army of brainwashed people who will follow their unique leader into the abyss.
There's smothing called national socialism, nazi fascist ideology and this party of Iran represents a manifestation of it in Lebanon now in 2006.
Absolutely true.
u see hizbullah culture is based on hatred and irrationality. they rely on their hatred, and have gone to extreme length that they forgot to love their country in a minimum limit. when a generation is raised on hatred, revenge and oppression, it becomes so vulnerable and susceptile to be lead and brainwashed. it's a suicidal mentality: the victim that wants to remain a vicitm to justify his need for revenge. on the other hand, u find other lebanese groups that supports hizbullah merely because nasrallah is the new trend, the new Rocky or Rambo, which means that u've got 2 groups, the first brainwashed from birth and the second searching desperately for an identity,a hero.
times are scary to the point no one should think about leaving the country, not anymore.
Dona
حواء - مطبخ مياز -
معجنات -
فساتين و أزياء -
تجهيز العروس -
الصحة و التغذية -
تحميل ملفات -
مطبخ - أطباق -
الأناقة -
الطفل -
رفع صور-
هنوف-
كأس العالم-
سبورت-
الرياضي-
نساء
He delivered ugg boots,
a pointed cheap ugg boots,message discount ugg boots,toaustralia ugg boots, Hamid Karzai, wholesale ugg boots,the president sheepskin ugg boots,of Afghanistan, ugg boots 5815,saying, ugg boots size 9, “The days ugg snowboots,of providing womens ugg boots,a blank check are over.”Addressing classic tall ugg boots ,critics who have likenedshort ugg boots, Afghanistan to Vietnam, Mr. Obama called the comparison “a false reading of history.” new ugg boots,And he spoke directly to winter ugg boots,the American people about the tough road ahead.
That frenzied Ed hardy clothesact of Ed hardy hoodiesdestruction, Cheap ed hardy hoodiesand the political Ed hardy t-shirtsmovements that Ed hardy shirtsflowed from Ed hardy clothingit, presented Cheap ed hardy bootsthe biggest challenge Ed hardy jeansto India’s Ed hardy jacketidentity Ed hardy swearteras a secular, Ed hardy shoesmulti-ethnic Ed hardy long sleevedemocracy since Ed hardy beltsthe country Ed hardy hatswas created by the bloody partition of Christian audigier clothingBritish India in 1947. Even today the site is Ed hardy beddingso sensitive that even Ed hardy cotton the smallest Ed hardy bootschanges Christian audigier jeans require Ed hardy womens bootsthe Ed hardy christian audigierapproval Christian audigier long sleevesof India’s Christian audigier womens hoodiesSupreme Court.
Anyone who has ever searched into looking for powerful glasses similar to rayban 3025 your next sunglasses will have by far and away invited their families whether are actually ray ban 3025 the. More often than not, you are may be coughing up too much ray ban 2140 in their eyes. You may be generally investing in some of the ray ban aviator rb 3025 completely. Yet, wedding and reception the case because of ray ban aviators 3025, since they are possibly worth every penny.
who's able to work with high standard rayban aviator 3025 accessories straight to price range rayban 3025 aviator sunglass window frames. Now you can be confident rayban 3025 sunglasses that an individual can be darning on class ray ban aviator 3025 sunlight without rayban wayfarer 2140 the price for high-end ray ban wayfarer 2140 designer label wall hangings.
With ray ban wayfarer zoom lens equipment designing, beautiful Ray suspend rg3025 aviator rayban aviator
eyeglasses combined with lovely finishing continue to keep touch into your fashion rayban aviators target market. Those days are gone each time rayban glasses glasses or contact lenses was mearly garnered to defend from Ultra-Violet ray ban aviators sun. Even when trendy Lewis exclude rg3025 aviator ray ban glasses your next sunglasses are created in a manner to you the very sunglass rayban sun light.
Do not use all of these Private Money Lender here.They are located in Nigeria, Ghana Turkey, France and Israel.My name is Mrs.Emily Michael, I am from Canada. Have you been looking for a loan?Do you need an urgent personal or business loan?contact Fast Legitimate Loan Approval he help me with a loan of $95,000 some days ago after been scammed of $12,000 from a woman claiming to be a loan lender from Nigeria but i thank God today that i got my loan worth $95,000.Feel free to contact the company for a genuine financial contact Email:(creditloan11@gmail.com)
Post a Comment