I see no room for the individual in Lebanon. The different communities are antagonistic towards each other, but I believe that their ire is mainly directed towards The Individual.
Most people claim that Lebanese leave Lebanon because of economic reasons. I doubt that that is the complete truth.
People also leave Lebanon because of social reasons - primarily among those, is the desire to escape from the suffocating grip of their families and communities. They seek to live life as free individuals.
So the immediate question to answer is: can an individual live in Lebanon today? If yes, I'd like to know how. If not, then I'd also like to know what can be done to change the situation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
I am not a scholar, but from my PoliSci 1 class I remember that traditional societies are based on religious/ethnic groups and clans, while modern societies are based on the Individual. Many of us dream of Lebanon as a modern society, if only for the selfish reason that it will be easier for us to fit in it. If we band together we might achieve something.
If we band together won't we become just another group/clan?
Raja,
A primary dictum of economics states that"There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch". There is a price for everything in life including a free spirit. One cannot be a nonconformist and yet worry about what the mainstream is going to think of his/her non conformism!!!! If one does then one is NOT a nonconformist lol.
Of course you can be a nonconformist in Lebanon, I have known many of them. Are there many nonconformists is a different question? Let me add to what Ms. Lev gave as an explanation for a nonmdynamic social structure the fact that our socities are NOT characterized by lots of mobility. Immobility leads to social stratification and noncreative solutions (that is why we call such socities traditional:-))
Raja, you have a point: Band together is the wrong choice of words. And as my (other) uncle Groucho used to say: I would not want to be part of a band that accepts me as a member. How about working, getting organized, cooperating instead? I also agree with ghassan, but here we have to find out if we are talking about a few marginal elements, or if there is really a strong desire for change and for individual freedom in the population at large. In both cases there will be no free lunches.
when u re from school learning to obey to the religious autority, bcz u re in a religious school how can u then become an individual by yourself.
the problem starts from childhood
and it s not about community, it s about education
Raja and the rest,
I've got to disagree. There is a lot of room for individualism.
Sadly, few people are willing to take the risk and suffer the consequences of becoming an individual. It requires severing yourself from your family, which means you need a strong will and some financial backing.
The problem is that for every Haifa there is some poor girl who gets mistreated and abused because she is no longer a member of her father's household.
Isn't it true that things are changing, very slowly but surely. For women, inter-religious marriages, artists, etc...all of which chip away at group-think and group control?
Ms Lev, Uncle Groucho's a wise man (unlike Uncle Karlo).
I believe that a more accurate description would be that Lebanon is composed of suffocating societies. The other characteristics you articulate are on the mark... and with the exception of the last, quite annoying.
I am afraid of returning back to Lebanon because of the small town mentality. I don't want to live in a city where I have to worry about what others would think in every single thing I do. Lebanon is a big prison.
Post a Comment